Search for: All records

Abstract Karrikins (KARs) are chemicals in smoke that can enhance germination of many plants. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) cv. Grand Rapids germinates in response to nanomolar karrikinolide (KAR1). Lettuce is much less responsive to KAR2 or a mixture of synthetic strigolactone analogs, rac-GR24. We investigated the molecular basis of selective and sensitive KAR1 perception in lettuce. The lettuce genome contains two copies of KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2), which in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) encodes a receptor that is required for KAR responses. LsKAI2b is more highly expressed than LsKAI2a in dry achenes and during early stages of imbibition. Through cross-species complementation assays in Arabidopsis, we found that an LsKAI2b transgene confers robust responses to KAR1, but LsKAI2a does not. Therefore, LsKAI2b likely mediates KAR1 responses in lettuce. We compared homology models of KAI2 proteins from lettuce and a fire-follower, whispering bells (Emmenanthe penduliflora). This identified pocket residues 96, 124, 139, and 161 as candidates that influence the ligand specificity of KAI2. Further support for the importance of these residues was found through a broader comparison of pocket residues among 281 KAI2 proteins from 184 asterid species. Almost all KAI2 proteins had either Tyr or Phe identity at position 124. Genes encoding Y124-type KAI2 are more broadly distributed in asterids than in F124-type KAI2. Substitutions at residues 96, 124, 139, and 161 in Arabidopsis KAI2 produced a broad array of responses to KAR1, KAR2, and rac-GR24. This suggests that the diverse ligand preferences observed among KAI2 proteins in plants could have evolved through relatively few mutations. 

Karrikins (KARs) are chemicals in smoke that can enhance germination of many plants. Lactuca sativa cv. Grand Rapids (lettuce), germinates in the presence of nanomolar karrikinolide (KAR1). We found that lettuce is much less responsive to KAR2 or a mixture of synthetic strigolactone analogs, rac-GR24. We investigated the molecular basis of selective and sensitive KAR1 perception in lettuce. The lettuce genome contains two copies of KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2), a receptor that is required for KAR responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. LsKAI2b is more highly expressed than LsKAI2a in dry achenes and during early stages of seed imbibition. Through cross-species complementation assays in Arabidopsis we found that LsKAI2b confers robust responses to KAR1, but LsKAI2a does not. Therefore, LsKAI2b likely mediates KAR1 responses in lettuce. We compared homology models of the ligand-binding pockets of KAI2 proteins from lettuce and a fire follower, Emmenanthe penduliflora. This identified pocket residues 96, 124, 139, and 161 as candidates that influence the ligand-specificity of KAI2. Further support for the significance of these residues was found through a broader comparison of pocket residue conservation among 324 asterid KAI2 proteins. We tested the effects of substitutions at these four positions in Arabidopsis thaliana KAI2 and found that a broad array of responses to KAR1, KAR2, and rac-GR24 could be achieved. 

Karrikin (KAR) molecules found in smoke stimulate seed germination of many plant species that emerge after fire. Genetic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have identified core components of the KAR signaling pathway, including an α/β-hydrolase, KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2), that is required for KAR responses. Although KAI2 is often considered a KAR receptor, recent evidence suggests that KARs may require metabolism to become bioactive signals. In addition to sensing KARs or a KAR-derived signal, KAI2 is thought to recognize an unknown endogenous signal, KAI2 ligand (KL). We generated loss-of-function mutations in KARRIKIN-UP-REGULATED F-BOX1 ( KUF1 ), which is a transcriptional marker of KAR/KL signaling in A. thaliana and other plants. The kuf1 mutant in Arabidopsis shows several phenotypes that are consistent with enhanced activity of the KAI2 pathway, including reduced hypocotyl elongation, enhanced cotyledon expansion in light-grown seedlings, increased root hair density and elongation, and differential expression of KAR/KL-responsive transcriptional markers. Seedling phenotypes of kuf1 are dependent on KAI2 and its signaling partner MORE AXILLARY GROWTH2 (MAX2). Furthermore, kuf1 mutants are hypersensitive to KAR 1 , but not to other molecules that can signal through KAI2 such as GR24. This implies that kuf1 does not increase the overall responsiveness of the KAI2-dependent signaling pathway, but specifically affects the ability of KAI2 to detect certain signals. We hypothesize that KUF1 imposes feedback inhibition of KL biosynthesis and KAR 1 metabolism. As an F-box protein, KUF1 likely participates in an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that imposes this regulation through polyubiquitylation of a protein target(s). 

Abstract The karrikin (KAR) receptor and several related signaling components have been identified by forward genetic screening, but only a few studies have reported on upstream and downstream KAR signaling components and their roles in drought tolerance. Here, we characterized the functions of KAR UPREGULATED F-BOX 1 (KUF1) in drought tolerance using a reverse genetics approach in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We observed that kuf1 mutant plants were more tolerant to drought stress than wild-type (WT) plants. To clarify the mechanisms by which KUF1 negatively regulates drought tolerance, we performed physiological, transcriptome, and morphological analyses. We found that kuf1 plants limited leaf water loss by reducing stomatal aperture and cuticular permeability. In addition, kuf1 plants showed increased sensitivity of stomatal closure, seed germination, primary root growth, and leaf senescence to abscisic acid (ABA). Genome-wide transcriptome comparisons of kuf1 and WT rosette leaves before and after dehydration showed that the differences in various drought tolerance-related traits were accompanied by differences in the expression of genes associated with stomatal closure (e.g. OPEN STOMATA 1), lipid and fatty acid metabolism (e.g. WAX ESTER SYNTHASE), and ABA responsiveness (e.g. ABA-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT 3). The kuf1 mutant plants had higher root/shoot ratios and root hair densities than WT plants, suggesting that they could absorb more water than WT plants. Together, these results demonstrate that KUF1 negatively regulates drought tolerance by modulating various physiological traits, morphological adjustments, and ABA responses and that the genetic manipulation of KUF1 in crops is a potential means of enhancing their drought tolerance.